Create a text file (typically named LICENSE or LICENSE.txt) in the root of your source code and copy the text of the license into the file.
It is a BSD-style license with a credit clause and thus compatible with the GNU Public License (GPL) version 3, but not with the GPL version 2. Most of the current BSD operating systems are open source and available for download, free of charge, under the BSD License, the most notable exceptions being macOS and iOS.
Most of the current BSD operating systems are open source and available for download, free of charge, under the BSD License, the most notable exceptions being macOS and iOS. The BSD License allows proprietary use, and for the software released under the license to be incorporated into proprietary products. [1] Yes, that is the whole idea of BSD. Both licenses, MIT and BSD allow you commercial use. You can do whatever and don't need to provide the source. The SilverStripe software is licensed under the open source (revised) BSD license, one of the most flexible and liberal licenses available.While there are hundreds of other content management systems available under the more restrictive GPL license, SilverStripe is (to our knowledge) the only advanced CMS available under the BSD license. BSD licenses without this restriction are sometimes called "revised" BSD licenses. Questions about the copyright in a license should be directed to the license …
The “GNU Affero General Public License” version 3; The “Artistic License” version 2.0; The “BSD 2-clause License” The “BSD 3-clause License” The “GNU General Public License” version 2; The “GNU General Public License” version 3 The 3-clause (modified) BSD license includes a non-endorsement clause, which says users don’t have the right to market software using BSD-licensed components in such a way that their product appears to be endorsed by the original developers. They also generally use a monolithic kernel architecture, apart from macOS, iOS, and DragonFly BSD which feature hybrid kernels .
The BSD license places restrictions that basically say the user is responsible for the software, and says nothing about anything else. The above observations regarding moral rights imply that putting code under an ISC or two-clause BSD license essentially makes the code as free as it can possibly get. The Free Software Foundation, which refers to the license as the "Modified BSD License", states that it is compatible with the GNU GPL.
Most Open Source licences allow commercial use in your own applications. The usual versions of the BSD license also require that anyone who redistributes the software may not use the name or affiliations of the author in advertising; saying "Our package foo uses special sauce developed by Bill Joy!"
In case of GPL/BSD, I don't think you could have any problems.
To place your license on Inactive status, all you need to do is send the Board an e-mail making that specific request.
We could follow the same approach as with the BSD license and interpret “shall be included” as “must not be removed” but the use of the active verb ‘shall’ makes …
Changing an Inactive license to Active will require payment of the $100 differential before the status is changed.
Software ; BSD License. Opensource.org is not the author of any of the licenses reproduced on this site. However, the public domain basically places no restrictions whatsoever on your software.
Copyright 2020 how to get bsd license